Ford GT
£450,000
How The Ford GT Was Aerodynamically Designed The Car Design Show
1. Overview
What is it?
|
---|
Engine | 3,5 l V6 |
Power | 647 hp @ 6,250 rpm (482 kW) |
Torque | 550 lb·ft @ 5,900 rpm (746 N·m) |
Induction | Turbocharged
|
The new Ford GT. We’ve driven it. About bloody time too. It’s almost a year since it won its class at Le Mans, and several weeks since Matt LeBlanc drove it on the TV show. But we’ve got a lot to get through, so let’s press on.
The basics you’re probably familiar with, but let’s go for a brief recap because there’s a reason the controversial V6 is the right engine for this car. And that’s because the Ford GT is all about packaging and aerodynamics and driving behaviour – it’s a chassis car, not an engine car.
Firstly, as road and race versions were developed in parallel, aero was critical. As Jamal Hameedi, the chief engineer of Ford Performance, puts it: “We wanted downforce, but it had to be efficient downforce – we didn’t want to pay high drag penalties. And that’s why we migrated to a fixed seating position, because that really allowed us to shrink the greenhouse and lower the frontal area.” So you stay where you are in the cockpit and pull pedals and wheel to where you want them.
The compact longitudinal V6 is shoved up against the carbon tub’s bulkhead, and the turbos that force its induction are further out under the massive aero channels. The intercoolers for the turbos are further out still, in the pod-racer outriggers. Now, if the GT had used a V8 it would have taken up more space and the GT wouldn’t have been able to make so much use of aero (plus it would have weighed more). How much aero? How much downforce? Well, that’s the one thing Ford won’t say, because it might allow rival race teams to calculate how much downforce the racing version produces.
But everywhere you look on the bodywork is an aero device of some description. The flying buttresses that link outrigger to central body are wing profile (they’re also hollow and channel intake air to the engine, which is pretty cool), the rear lights are hollow and vent air from the intercoolers, there’s an underbody diffuser, splitter, flat undertray, active rear wing, plus, Hameedi points out, “you would never have a hole unless it’s feeding a cooler.”
How weird would it be if this bleeding edge aero work was teamed with an old school big-banger V8? So it’s an all-aluminium, dry-sump 3497cc V6 that develops 647bhp at 6250rpm and 550lb ft at 5900rpm and pushes all that to the rear wheels via a seven-speed twin clutch gearbox. The suspension is double unequal length wishbones all round with inboard spring/damper units. There are carbon ceramic brakes with six piston Brembo front calipers clamping 394mm discs (four piston calipers work the 360mm rear discs), and hydraulic, not electric, power steering.
And then there’s Track Mode. Twist a knurled knob on the steering wheel to ‘T’, confirm with another button press and the GT drops 50mm instantly. It’s like the underside of the GT is a suction clamp. All told it has a dry weight of 1,385kg. Which probably means it weighs getting on for 1,500kg when loaded with fluids. So not much lighter than an Audi R8 V10 Plus, while a McLaren 675LT has a dry weight of 1,230kg…
The McLaren’s important, because by Ford’s own admission, that’s the car they’ve benchmarked the GT against. Right, enough information, let’s get on with driving it.
2. Driving
What is it like on the road?
We’ll start on track, because I’m at Laguna Seca and it’s epic. In Track Mode the GT is just 41.7 inches tall, the wheels have disappeared inside the arches and it doesn’t look like there’s enough clearance for them to steer at all.
The second you pull away you’re aware of a condensed, focused energy. No slack, no rubber, just this delicious sense of being strapped to a very honed, precisely engineered machine. Strapped right to it, so you feel the vibrations, the movement, get a real sense of what the wheels are up to. The long-arm suspension is bushed, but it feels rose-jointed. The pictures reveal that it does roll, enough to tuck those tyres right up inside the arches, but you don’t feel that. What you feel is hard, flat cornering grip and sensational mid-corner balance.
Sat quite a long way in board you’re almost at the centre of the car, equally aware of what front and back axles are up to. Because the steering feel is so good, the brakes so pleasing to use and the chassis responses are so pure and instant, it doesn’t take long to get confident in the GT, and start to build rhythm and speed. It’s bloody fast. Fast enough that around Laguna Seca you never get a break, never get time to pause and take stock. By the time you’ve managed the tight exit of the last corner, you’re already travelling so fast down the main straight you’re concerned about the tricky jink left and blind crest just after the bridge.
Because you sit so centrally, the GT seems to pivot around you, so changes of direction feel very cohesive. As you go faster, you start to notice a hint of understeer into the slower corners, but this is a fast lap car, not a skids-n-slide machine, so that mostly acts as a reminder that the car is having to work hard - it’s reassuring. If you’re super keen you might want it to be a bit more edgy, a bit more grippy at the front end just to loosen the rear a touch, but that’s a matter of personal taste. The steering isn’t as sharp as a Ferrari rack, you need to apply a bit of lock, but that’s no hardship because you’re getting good information back.
Once past the apex, getting back on the power actually neutralises the car, transferring weight backwards to the fat 325/30 ZR20 Michelin Cup 2 tyres, and because you’re in Track mode the GT’s two turbos are always spinning, an anti-lag system ensuring throttle response is as crisp and immediate as it can be. It’s not perfect, and sometimes can get a bit carried away, over-boosting when you’re not ready for it, but on the whole the V6 hits as hard as you want, when you want, and you exit flat and fast.
You can play with this balance, and the GT lets you get away with stuff that other supercars would punish. You can trail brake right up to the apex without the back trying to step out of line, flick-flack through quick direction changes with not a hint of heave. Laguna Seca is a challenging, difficult track, but the Ford GT made it glorious. The Corkscrew should be super nerve-wracking, but the blind braking zone held no fears, and it pitched in hard, flat and accurate, drove itself down the cliff, skooshed the carbon splitter in the compression, and carried a dizzying amount of speed onwards to Rainey Curve and the addictive camber at Turn 10.
And when we did some skids for the cameras, it proved to be just as delicately balanced beyond the limit. That may seem irrelevant, but it’s the sign of a well set-up car when throttle, steering, back axle and suspension prove so biddable. Handling-wise the GT is something of a masterpiece on track.
Compared to the McLaren 675LT? I think it’s better balanced and manages its extra kilos superbly well, but it’s not quite as eye-popping in other areas. It doesn’t attack a circuit quite as aggressively as the British car, and its power delivery isn’t as visceral and hard-hitting.
So, the engine. Well, it makes a lot of noise for a V6, but the noise is more about quantity than quality. It’s not as charismatic as a V8 and, yeah, part of me misses that. But then I think about how remarkably stable the GT feels at ballistic speeds, how it seems to shed weight and hunker into the circuit, and reckon that I’m happy with the compromise.
The power delivery itself is rather one-dimensional, too. From both aural and acceleration perspectives there’s not much point seeking out the 7,000rpm redline – the good work has been done by 5,500rpm and the gears are closely stacked enough that the next one in the chamber will force you onwards with plentiful urge.
It’s fast, but I do wonder that now we have a McLaren with over 700bhp, a forthcoming Speciale version of the Ferrari 488 GTB which is bound to chase a similarly lofty figure and rumours that the Porsche GT2 RS will have upwards of 700bhp as well, whether the GT might be left feeling a bit limp. As it is, its power to weight ratio of around 425bhp/tonne already lags a chunk behind the 675LT’s (497bhp/tonne).
Nevertheless, it’s hardly short of grunt and punches itself forward very hard indeed. But it’s nothing the chassis can’t handle, so very quickly you feel confident using a lot of the power, knowing the brakes, steering and suspension will respond exactly as you want to get you out of whatever situation the engine has just got you in to. They’re the stars of the show. The V6 is there to provide acceleration and to do that as effectively and responsively as it can, but you get your thrills, your value for money, from the handling, the cornering, the suspension, the aero.
Out on the road it’s perfectly driveable – the visibility’s not too bad, it’s a surprise to find creep built in to the drivetrain, but it does make low speed driving smooth. You could use it to pop about in, but it’s a serious car – it never feels less than positive and informative on the road, so although the movements are tight and controlled, the info bombardment does make it wearing. And there’s a fair amount of road noise, too. You shouldn’t care about that.
3. On the inside
Layout, finish and space
It’s very bare in here. There’s an acreage of flat, plain carbon, no carpets, basic heating controls, and the infotainment screen is from a Fiesta. The luxury layer is missing. It’s a reminder that this is a car you’re meant to drive, not pose about in.
I’m still not sure about the steering wheel. It might ape the racing car’s with all the controls on it and the odd hexagonal shape, but it’s just not quite as good to hold as it should be, despite the Alcantara trim. It’s a small point – and here’s another. The seats aren’t as aggressively shaped and bucketed as you might expect. They’re slightly soft with shallow thigh bolsters and mounted a touch high in relation to the rest of the cockpit. I was doubtful about how hard they’d hold you, but on track I never felt like I was falling out of them, so I’ll chalk them down as deceptively supportive.
Two people fit much better than you might expect given they’re sat as close to each other as the occupants of a Lotus Elise, but there’s very little space to put anything. The 11-litre boot is smaller than most gloveboxes. There isn’t one of those. No cupholders either. Barely anywhere for a phone or wallet.
But forget all that, because what matters is the way the cabin makes you feel, which aside from your comfy buttocks, is very, very eager to get going. The controls on the steering wheel are ergonomically fine, and there’s a delicious tactility to the knurled metal knobs that control the driving modes and wipers, and the gearbox on the centre console. It feels eventful and exciting.
4. Owning
Running costs and reliability
It costs $400,000, and no matter what angle you’re viewing it from, that’s a heap of money. We don’t need to attach ‘for a Ford’ to that, because the badge and brand is almost irrelevant here – Ford has racing pedigree, and with the possible exception of the engine, this car has nothing in common with anything else in the range. I admire their vetting process as well – deciding to prioritise sales to long-time Ford customers rather than the merely very wealthy.
Priced a nudge above where the McLaren 675LT sat in the UK, they’re only building 1,000 globally and given the current appetite for supercars – not to mention the prices that previous generations of Ford GTs and GT40s are making currently, and it should be a safe place for your money. A good investment. Which isn’t the right way to think about this car at all.
One more thing. If it looked less radical I think Ford would struggle to justify the £320,000 (at current exchange rates) asking price. But the way it looks, the way it behaves and the way it’s priced all go hand in hand. Oh, and in case you’re wondering, between a morning at Laguna Seca and a day on the Pacific Coast highway, we averaged about 12mpg.
5. Verdict
Final thoughts and pick of the range
The Ford GT is not a supercar in the same mould as an Audi R8, a Ferrari 488 GTB or even a McLaren 720S. It’s the next step on, where they strip out the weight, ramp up the aggression and really work the aero. Really, really work the aero in the case of the GT. It’s utterly, I suspect purposely, impractical which serves to remind you that it’s all about the driving.
And it is a sensational car to drive. Always on the balls of its feet, it’s beautifully balanced, sharp, stable and rewarding. It’s also exciting. This is not one of those relentlessly efficient cars that’s too concerned about lap times to have a good time. Instead it sucks you into its world. It’s joyful, exuberant, friendly enough to entice the less experienced, talented enough to fascinate the chargers.
No, the engine isn’t that charismatic or exciting to use, but there’s no denying the force it offers. Just know that you’ll get your kicks through your touch points not your ears. And if it didn’t have this engine, if it had a V8, the packaging would be different and the GT wouldn’t have its USP. Because the aero, the buttresses and those ridiculous channels, aren’t only an instant visual ident, but allows this car to carve its own place in the market. It’s a compelling machine.
Visit us at:
Ceator by : Navy Chou
Loaction : Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Youtube Channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPgOJnyWFhoheCGZOE0qEGg?view_as=subscriber
Facebook Page : https://www.facebook.com/techedu9
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/techedu9/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/TechEDU18
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/TechEDU9/boards/
Blog : https://techedu99.blogspot.com/